The recent news of Michael Vick’s conditional reinstatement into the NFL has caused quite a stir. Public opinion on Vick’s return to the NFL is split it seems. While many fans are happy to have the talented quarterback reinstated, there are many others, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), that vehemently oppose Vick being allowed back into the NFL.
For those of you who are not football fans, or perhaps have not heard about this story, I’ll recap. Michael Vick was the quarterback for the Atlanta Flacons. He was talented, and one of the rising young stars in the league. However, in August of 2007, the National Football League suspended Vick, for funding and participating in a dog-fighting ring. Vick himself was involved in the killing and torture of losing dogs.
Now as a dog lover, and animal lover in general, I would like to say that I find what happened more than a little disturbing. I do not condone dog-fighting rings, and I especially do not support the torture and killing of animals.
Be that as it may, Michael Vick was sentenced to a 23-month prison term, which is now over. He has been released, and he has paid his debt to society at large as imposed upon on him by the people society pays to make these decisions. It is time to move forward.
On Monday the NFL conditionally reinstated Vick, and he is free to sign with a NFL team should he find one willing to hire him. He is allowed to participate in practices and the final two pre-season games, however, he is not allowed to play in a regular season game until at least week 6, when the commissioner of the NFL will re-evaluate the situation.
With that announcement has come a wave of public outrage, with PETA leading the charge. Many people seem to feel because of what Vick did, he should no longer be allowed to play professional football. Some feel that these athletes and are role models, and that Vick no longer is able to fill that role.
Look, I understand that what Vick did was wrong. However, I would have to disagree with those who feel Vick should not be allowed to play in the NFL because of his crimes that he has laready served his sentence for. In my view, Michael Vick has an opportunity to be an example of making positive changes, and in doing so become an excellent example for others who have had made poor choices in their past.
For those of you who are not football fans, or perhaps have not heard about this story, I’ll recap. Michael Vick was the quarterback for the Atlanta Flacons. He was talented, and one of the rising young stars in the league. However, in August of 2007, the National Football League suspended Vick, for funding and participating in a dog-fighting ring. Vick himself was involved in the killing and torture of losing dogs.
Now as a dog lover, and animal lover in general, I would like to say that I find what happened more than a little disturbing. I do not condone dog-fighting rings, and I especially do not support the torture and killing of animals.
Be that as it may, Michael Vick was sentenced to a 23-month prison term, which is now over. He has been released, and he has paid his debt to society at large as imposed upon on him by the people society pays to make these decisions. It is time to move forward.
On Monday the NFL conditionally reinstated Vick, and he is free to sign with a NFL team should he find one willing to hire him. He is allowed to participate in practices and the final two pre-season games, however, he is not allowed to play in a regular season game until at least week 6, when the commissioner of the NFL will re-evaluate the situation.
With that announcement has come a wave of public outrage, with PETA leading the charge. Many people seem to feel because of what Vick did, he should no longer be allowed to play professional football. Some feel that these athletes and are role models, and that Vick no longer is able to fill that role.
Look, I understand that what Vick did was wrong. However, I would have to disagree with those who feel Vick should not be allowed to play in the NFL because of his crimes that he has laready served his sentence for. In my view, Michael Vick has an opportunity to be an example of making positive changes, and in doing so become an excellent example for others who have had made poor choices in their past.
I wonder what purpose all of this anger and negative energy really serves? I mean, if you are for animal safety, why not focus your energy on creating safe environments for animals. Perhaps put some time into saving the wetlands so that we don’t lose more species. What I can’t agree with, is condemming this man for all of his existence. What he has done, he has done, and no amount of anger is going to change that reality. Thus, the focus now, should be on how to protect animals in the future from these types of abuse. Not only that but on helping and supporting a man to change his life and make better choices in the future.
What gain is there for society if everytime somebody commits a crime, they are obstucted from ever changing their life for the better, and becoming a valuable member of society? I can see no gain. In fact, if this were to be the case, we would simply release people from prisons, only to have them commit another crime and go back. All that creates is more victims.
Now I realize that there is a high return to prison rate. However, I wonder if society has not created some conditions that make this likely to happen. Stopping a man from working because of a criminal background, means he is going to have to find some alternative way to live. It’s safe to say that unless someone can find a way to live on his own, it will come at another person’s expense.
I for one hope Michael Vick does make it back onto the football field. I also hope that he finds it within himself to make changes to his lifestyle, and become an example of positive change. It is my belief that the world needs more of these examples, if we are to give any hope to the kids that are struggling and perhaps heading down the wrong road today.
With so many people focusing their energy on anger towards this situation, they are only harming themselves, and bringing those around them down. Anger can not change what happened to those dogs. So why feel angry? Why not make your own positive change, and turn your anger into love for the animals and go do something that will make a positive impact on future animal safety?
Personally, I choose to hope for positive change.



